Sure, I found that out later. What I got was a work suiable for
further editing, assuming the editor was already familar with FATE. It
was not suitable as a review copy for someone not already fluent in
FATE though.
Hotjets
On Apr 26, 3:23 pm, Shane Ivey <shane.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That's why I didn't review FATE Kerberos Club, even though I was sent
> > the first version of the PDF. The point value of the NPCS was so often
> > miscalculated that it actively interfered with my ability to
> > understand the rules and it completely put me off the FATE version.
>
> FWIW, the first release of the FATE edition of Kerberos got corrected
> really heavily and rereleased a few weeks later.
>
> --
> *Shane Ivey, Arc Dream Publishing*
> Cthulhu Mythos gaming, every quarter:
> TheUnspeakableOath.com<http://www.theunspeakableoath.com>
> Is your world worth saving? Join the conspiracy:www.delta-green.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cult of ORE" group.
To post to this group, send email to cult-of-ore@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cult-of-ore+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cult-of-ore?hl=en.
[ORE] Re: Stats, stats, stats
2:18 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment